Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv30046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Andreassi v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2021cv30098
Plaintiff: Eileen Andreassi
Defendant: Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Six Flags New England and Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Six Flags New England
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamel v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc, et al
as 3:2016cv30088
Plaintiff: Colleen Hamel
Defendant: Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc, and Stuart Amusement Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kapur v. Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2012cv30135
Plaintiff: Margaret Kapur
Defendant: Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navedo v. Six Flags, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv30236
Plaintiff: Jackeline Navedo
Defendant: Six Flags, Inc., Riverside Park Enterprises, Inc. and Stuart Amusement Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Safety Braking Corporation et al v. Six Flags Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00127
Plaintiff: Safety Braking Corporation, Magnetar Technologies Corp. and G&T Conveyor Co.
Defendant: Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., Tierco Maryland Inc., Busch Entertainment Corp. and others
Counter Claimant: Tierco Maryland Inc., Cedar Fair LP, Paramount Parks Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Safety Braking Corporation, Magnetar Technologies Corp., G&T Conveyor Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?