Cases 1 - 6 of 6
King-Moore v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10556
Plaintiff:
Darlene King-Moore
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and others
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv01788
Defendant:
Ivor J. Evans, Scott D Rued, Chad M. Utrup and others
Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00474
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc, Mark A Diblasi and Peter R Armbruster
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Michael Easley and Armin Leuze
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Strougo v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Strougo and Robert Strougo
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc, Mark A Diblasi and Peter R Armbruster
Petitioner:
Armin Leuze, Michael Easley and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi et al v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Goss and Robert Goss
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc, Scott D. Rued, HCI Equity Partners LLC and others
Petitioner:
Bryan Reifsnyder, Armin Leuze and Michael Easley
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert Strougo
Lead Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lyndes v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06601
Defendant:
Peter R Armbruster, Scott D Rued, Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene Lyndes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
