Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Duge v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04261
Defendant:
Daniel Florenco, City of New York, Kevin Mundinger and others
Plaintiff:
Roben Duge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Duge v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04260
Defendant:
City of New York, Timothy Devine, FDNY and others
Plaintiff:
Roben Duge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Nanduca v. R & A King Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv07669
Plaintiff:
Grisel Nanduca
Defendant:
R & A King Corp., Roben Tatanov and Abby Cohen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierre v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2013cv01768
Plaintiff:
Robens Pierre
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
St. Louis v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2013cv01132
Plaintiff:
Gervil St. Louis, St. Louis Gervil and Guisman Pierre
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ilguens Jean, Felix Pierre, Wisky Jerome and others
Defendant:
Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St. John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, American Association, U.S.A., Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier and others
Special Master:
Attorney James T. Cowdery
Consolidated Defendant:
Hope E. Carter and 1-14 John Doe
Not Classified By Court:
Fr. James E. Grummer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pierre v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Robens Pierre
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierre v. Perlitz et al
as 3:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robens Pierre
Defendant:
Douglas Perlitz, Paul E. Carrier, Hope E. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Braveboy v. Ruby Shoes, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02813
Plaintiff:
Michele Braveboy and Michele Braveboy
Defendant:
Ruby Shoes, Inc. and Roben Rahmanzadeh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
