Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Davis v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05493
Plaintiff:
Deanna Davis and Robert Woodrow Davis
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. USA
as 3:2013cv01153
Petitioner:
Robert James Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Richter et al
as 3:2012cv03119
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Davis
Defendant:
Robert Richter, David M Kaylor, Steven W Kaylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Farmer et al
as 3:2012cv03003
Plaintiff:
Robert L Davis
Defendant:
Michael J Farmer, Ray Willis, Michael McAfee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System v. Baxter International Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System
Defendant:
Baxter International Inc , Walter E. Boomer , Blake E. Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Parkinson et al
as 1:2010cv07317
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Robert L. Parkinson, Walter E. Boomer, Blake E. Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGORY III v. Baxter International Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07149
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY III
Defendant:
Baxter International Inc., Robert L Parkinson, Jr and Robert M Davis
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Salyers
as 1:2010cv07131
Plaintiff:
Patricia Salyers
Defendant:
Walter E. Boomer, Blake E. Devitt, John D. Forsyth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
