Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Adamantium Processing LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Synergy Virtual Services LLC, Adamantium Processing LLC and National Freedom Project
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Jack In The Box Inc.
as 4:2020cv01181
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones
Defendant:
Jack In The Box Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv03381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCowan v. Jones
as 4:2010cv04170
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene McCowan
Defendant:
Robert Alton Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv01063
Petitioner:
Robert G Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Douglas v. Haynes et al
as 4:2009cv00598
Plaintiff:
Ralph O Douglas
Defendant:
Theodore Haynes, Samuel D Adamo, Harry B Jones, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00841
Plaintiff:
Robert L Jones
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04314
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Garner v. BP Amoco Chemical Company et al
as 3:2007cv00221
Plaintiff:
Aaron Wilson Garner , Izell Ardie , Eric Davis and others
Defendant:
BP Products North America Inc
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Jesus Adame , Rogelio Bazan , Gilbert Cantu and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Marvin Booker , Isaac Chapa , Andre Edwards and others
Movant:
Ebony Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
