Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Saville v. Webb et al
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Elena Lyadina Saville
Defendant:
Clarence William Webb, Robert Allen Whitworth, Randy Clarence Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dick v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Dick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barfield v. Dash Point Distributing , LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00219
Defendant:
Dash Point Distributing, LLC and Jeffrey Lee Hand
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Barfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DANENBERG v. PHILBIN
as 5:2019cv00356
Petitioner:
ROBERT ALLEN DANENBERG
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Danenberg v. Crite et al
as 1:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Joy Johnson and SGT FNU Crite
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danenberg v. Members of the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2019cv03912
Defendant:
Members of the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danenberg v. Philbin
as 4:2019cv00202
Petitioner:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Respondent:
Warden Edward Philbin
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Danenberg v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danenberg v. Philbin
as 4:2018cv00280
Petitioner:
Danenberg Robert Allen and Robert Allen Danenberg
Respondent:
Edward Philbin
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Futral v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Futral
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
