Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Arnold v. Car-D-Nel, Inc
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold
Defendant:
Car-D-Nel, Inc doing business as Maxi Auto Service Centers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10236
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARNOLD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92660
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52913
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARPE v. SINGLETON
as 7:2015cv00008
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
ARTIS SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHARPE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 7:2013cv00011
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SHARPE v. Jackson State Prison
as 7:2012cv00030
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
CARL HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Sharpe, Jr. v. Stephen Butler, et al
as 12-10568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN BUTLER, WAYNE LUKE, ANTHONY HEATH and others
Sharpe et al v. Butler et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Defendant:
Stephen Butler, Wayne Luke, Anthony Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
