Cases 41 - 50 of 201
Burton Landman v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-3737
Petitioner - Appellant:
Burton Kenneth Landman
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Chief Warden and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Litschewski v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2016cv04140
Plaintiff:
Richard Litschewski
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley and Jennifer Stanwick-Klemik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. CBM Correctional Food Services et al
as 4:2016cv04133
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale
Defendant:
CBM Correctional Food Services, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Bauer v. Warden Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-3558
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jeremy Bauer
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Robert Dooley, SDSP and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Corder v. Dooley et al
as 4:2016cv04124
Petitioner:
Ronald Ray Corder
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Kinter v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-3333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Kinter
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Director of Prison Operations, Darren Young, Warden, SDSP, Troy Ponto, Associate Warden, Jameson Annex and others
Johnston v. Dooley et al
as 1:2016cv01035
Petitioner:
David H. Johnston
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odegard v. Dooley et al
as 4:2016cv04101
Petitioner:
Russell Alan Odegard
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odegard v. Dooley et al
as 4:2016cv04100
Petitioner:
Russell Alan Odegard
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricky Sieler v. Robert Dooley
as 16-2494
Petitioner:
Ricky Jay Sieler
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
