Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1225
Not Yet Classified: In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFFS, CITY OF BENWOOD, CITY OF BROCKTON and others
Appellant: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Defendant: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, now known as EIDP, Inc. and others
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1077
Not Yet Classified: In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: DEFENDANTS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FOAM, INCORPORATED and others
Appellant: TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, TOWN OF HARRIETSTOWN, NEW YORK and TOWN OF ISLIP, NEW YORK
Robert Supinger, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 19-1480
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH HILL, Assistant Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Virginia, TOM PENNY, Director of Fuels Tax for the Department of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Virginia, RICHARD D. HOLCOMB, Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ROBERT E. LEE SUPINGER, JR.
Robert Supinger, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 19-1479
Defendant / Appellee: TOM PENNY, Director of Fuels Tax for the Department of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Virginia, RICHARD D. HOLCOMB, Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Virginia, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT E. LEE SUPINGER, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1932
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?