Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Decker v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Decker
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Octavia Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kuhlman v. Hines et al
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Kuhlman
Defendant:
Officer Nicholas Hines, Officer Serena Cunningham and Town of Normal, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv03063
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv02482
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
K. et al v. Health Care Service Corp.
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Robert K., Monica K. and John K.
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corp. dba Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois and Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
