Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cullen Hankerson v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-36160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CULLEN M. HANKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BERNIE WARNER, ROBERT MCKENNA and others
Hankerson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05182
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Bernie Warner , Robert McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bukovsky v. Miller-Stout et al
as 3:2012cv05875
Petitioner:
Charles Andrew Bukovsky
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deshan Watson v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 11-35611
Petitioner - Appellant:
DESHAN WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, ELDON VAIL, Director WDOC and ROBERT MCKENNA, WA State Attorney General
Rothermel v. Vail et al
as 2:2011cv01161
Petitioner:
Perry M Rothermel
Respondent:
Eldon Vail, Robert McKenna and Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Miller-Stout et al
as 3:2011cv05013
Petitioner:
Deshan Watson
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout , Eldon Vail and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Klym v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35374
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH DALE KLYM
Respondent - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, STOLC and ROBERT MCKENNA
Robert Bonds v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35302
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT BONDS
Respondent - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, ROBERT MCKENNA, WA State Attorney General and WARDEN STOLC
Williams v. Glebe et al
as 2:2009cv01507
Petitioner:
Lance Williams
Respondent:
Pat Glebe, Eldon Vail and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klym v. Vail et al
as 2:2009cv05041
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dale Klym
Respondent:
Eldon Vail, Stolc and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
