Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Moco v. Searls
as 6:2023cv06316
Petitioner:
Robert Moco
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moco v. Janik
as 22-348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant / Appellee:
J.M. Janik, Corrections Officer and Philip Voltz
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and New York Department of Corrects Medical (Gowanda)
Moco v. Janik
as 22-307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant / Appellee:
J.M. Janik, Corrections Officer and Philip Voltz
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and New York Department of Corrects Medical (Gowanda)
Moco v. Bell
as 1:2020cv11132
Petitioner:
Robert Moco
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moco v. Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
as 1:2020cv10536
Petitioner:
Robert Moco
Respondent:
Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moco v. Janik
as 18-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant - Appellee:
J.M. Janik, Corrections Officer, New York State Department of Corrections, New York State Department of Corrections, Medical (Gowanda) and others
Moco v. New York City Police Dept.
as 18-762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant - Appellee:
Police Officer, New York City Shield No. 935192 and New York City Police Department
Moco v. City of New York
as 18-788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Police Officers John Does, who made false arrest witness and John Doe, who made false accusations
Defendant:
New York City Police Department
Moco v. New York City Police Departmen
as 18-787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Moco and John Doe, Witness
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Police Department, City of New York and Police Officers John Does
Moco v. New York Police Department
as 18-757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Moco
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Police Department, New York City Police Department and Police Officer, 115-Precinct
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
