Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Suarez v. Sullivan
as 24-872
Plaintiff:
ELVIN SUAREZ
Defendant:
ROBERT MORTON, Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, RYAN LAHEY, Office of Mental Health Unit Chief, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, ABADUL QAYYUM, Psychiatrist, Downstate Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity and others
Carew v. Morton
as 23-7934
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRANCE CAREW
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT MORTON
Lloyd v. Morton
as 23-357
Petitioner / Appellant:
Derrick Lloyd
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Morton
Loving v. Superintendent
as 23-131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Franklin Loving
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Morton, Acting Superintendent of Downstate Corr. Facility
Defendant:
Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility, M.D. John or Jane Doe, Noriel DeGuzman, Physician Assistant, Downstate Corr. Facility and others
Valverde v. Folks
as 22-848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angel Valverde
Defendant / Appellee:
J.D. Folks, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, L. Brown, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, John Gonzalez, Sergeant at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and others
Homer v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Michael Homer
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, M.D. and Robert Morton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coward v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Rodney Coward
Defendant:
Physician John or Jane Doe and Superintendent Robert Morton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Daivon Pryor
Defendant:
Physician John or Jane Doe, M.D. and Superintendent Robert Morton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Morton
as 21-2075
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Morton
Montes v. Morton
as 21-1719
Petitioner / Appellant:
Germaine Montes
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Morton, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
