Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gibson v. The City Commissioner of NYC C
as 17-2864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bennie Gibson
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner New York City Department of Corrections, Deputy Commissioner of New York City Corrections, Warden of Robert N. Davoren Center and others
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4
as 17-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Devin Keitt
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Brian S. Fischer, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, State of New York and others
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, #4, as Chancellor of New York City Department of Education, John/Jane Doe, #1, as Principal of Public School 236, John/Jane Doe, #2, Dean and others
McBride v. City of New York
as 16-4326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Titus McBride, Spc.
Respondent - Appellee:
Ada Pressley, Warden at Robert N. Davoren Center (RNDC)
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Albert Velez, Detective David Mischa and others
Capel v. M.D.C./ C.O. John Doe's et al
as 7:2014cv07218
Plaintiff:
Westley Capel
Defendant:
M.D.C./ C.O. John Doe's and Robert N. Davoren/ C.O. John Doe's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Robert N. Davoren Center
as 7:2014cv06815
Plaintiff:
Mayko Moreno
Defendant:
Robert N. Davoren Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor v. Robert N. Davoren, Detention Center
as 7:2014cv06817
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Victor
Defendant:
Robert N. Davoren, Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingate v. Robert N. Davoren Center (RNDC) et al
as 1:2012cv04118
Plaintiff:
Chris Wingate
Defendant:
Robert N. Davoren Center (RNDC), Anna M. Kross Center (AMKC), New York City Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingate v. Robert N Davoren Center
as 1:2012cv04125
Plaintiff:
Chris Wingate
Defendant:
Robert N Davoren Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
