Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hayden v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
as 2:2023cv01694
Petitioner:
Robert O. Hayden
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hayden v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Robert O. Hayden
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayden v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2021cv00130
Petitioner:
Robert O Hayden
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00276
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Thomas v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00432
Petitioner:
Robert O. Thomas
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spaude et al v. Mysyk et al
as 1:2016cv01836
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Spaude , Angela M. Spaude and Dennis C. Macieski
Defendant:
Paul Mysyk, Harrison Schumacher, Quantum Energy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2016cv00286
Petitioner:
Robert O Hayden
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wince v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01782
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Wince and Robert O. Wince
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv00795
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Powell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peterson et al v. Buskirk
as 3:2012cv00718
Defendant:
Alan S Buskirk and Robert O. Jones
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Peterson, Jr. and Michelle Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
