Cases 171 - 180 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
YANG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01270
Plaintiff:
ZHIYONG YANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HASHEMI et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01269
Plaintiff:
SEYED HASHEMI and NEDA NIKBAKHT
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ALI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01176
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED A. ALI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, ANDREA QUARANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
CUSUMANO v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2007cv00971
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE CUSUMANO
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALEZ, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, MICHAEL A. CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
