Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Schenk v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv07185
Plaintiff:
Caroline Schenk
Defendant:
Robert Smith and United States Postal Service
Smith v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv05868
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Famighetti et al
as 1:2014cv04913
Defendant:
John Doe and Sergeant Anthony Famighetti
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 1:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
Janelle Smith and Robert Smith
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schenk v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Caroline Schenk
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Gatto et al v. Sentry Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05721
Plaintiff:
Paul Gatto and Robert Smith
Defendant:
Sentry Services, Inc. , Sentry Services, Ltd. , Mayrich Construction Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2012cv08309
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
Westchester County, Wilcox and Westchester County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03819
Plaintiff:
Arthur F. Anderson, Lorain A. Anderson, Newton L. Ball and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Smith v. RMS Residential Properties, LLC
as 1:2012cv03447
Defendant:
RMS Residential Properties, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Crenshaw v. Harris et al
as 6:2012cv06184
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
Robert Harris, John Van Loon, Richard Fontanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
