Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CHAMBERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
EBONY CHAMBERS and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. WARDEN DELANEY OF (CFCF) et al
as 2:2020cv01244
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN DELANEY OF (CFCF) and ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAYLOR v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv03368
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMMONWEALTH COURT, FRANK PALUMBO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAYLOR v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 2:2017cv03369
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, THE COMMONWEALTH COURT PHILADELPHIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER (CJC), FRANK PALUMBO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv02444
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CURRAN-FROM HOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAYLOR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv06908
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2010cv00871
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
