Cases 31 - 40 of 292
Johnson v. Home Town Inn by Red Roof
as 22-1905
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Pro Se Government, Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Corporation Government Employee, Deborah Labadini, Pro Se Corporation Government Employee and others
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse
as 22-1774
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Rodeway Inn Syracuse, Pro Se Corporation, Choice Hotels International Inc., Pro Se Corporation, Commissioner Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Govt. Employee and others
Johnson v. Jefferson
as 22-1815
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
A. Jefferson, Pro Se Govt. Agent, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, Pro Se Govt., J. Ryan McMahon, II, Pro Se Govt. Agent and others
Johnson v. Tunecore et al
as 1:2022cv06460
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Tunecore, iTunes, Apple Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Johnson v. Erie County City Court et al
as 1:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Erie County City Court, Erie County Court, Eleana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Days Inn by Wyndham Syracuse
as 22-1602
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Days Inn by Wyndham Syracuse, Corporation and Indeed, Corporation
Johnson v. Embassy Suites by Hilton
as 22-1576
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Embassy Suites by Hilton and Indeed
Johnson v. Springhill Suite Syracuse Carrier Circle
as 22-1613
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Springhill Suite Syracuse Carrier Circle and Indeed
Johnson v. Candlewood Suites East Syracuse
as 22-1586
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Candlewood Suites East Syracuse, Corporation and Indeed, Corporation
Johnson v. Cresthill Suites
as 22-1605
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Cresthill Suites, Corporation and Indeed, Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
