Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gokey v. Economidy et al
as 5:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Gokey
Defendant:
John M. Economidy, Mary D. Roman, Rita Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gokey v. Economidy et al
as 4:2022cv02092
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Gokey
Defendant:
John M. Economidy, Judge Mary D. Roman, Rita Spiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gokey v. Economidy et al
as 5:2021cv00987
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Gokey
Defendant:
John M. Economidy, Mary D. Roman, Anthony Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gokey v. Johnson
as 3:2020cv00348
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Gokey
Defendant:
Sgt. Ode T. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02843
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez, Donald Rau, Harvey Michael Grisham and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02838
Plaintiff:
Linda Driscoll, Mark Hudson, Ronald Weckwerth and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez, Michael Hunter, Jerry D White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Colt v. Tarrant County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Colt
Defendant:
Tarrant County Sheriff's Department, Dee Anderson, Chris Salome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
as 4:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WADE
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL SOS ASSISTANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00953
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mooney v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Mooney
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
