Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Juarez (Juan Roberto Ramirez)
as 22-2065
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Claudia Juarez, Omar Juarez Andrade, AKA Negro, Tomas Anzaldua, AKA Tommy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Roberto Ramirez, Jr.
United States of America v. Olivo (Clase)
as 21-874
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Clase
United States of America v. Olivo (Edwin Romero)
as 19-4053
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Anibal Gonzalez)
as 19-3684
Defendant:
Carlos Acosta, Wayne Scott, Jesus Mata and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anibal Gonzalez
Ramirez-Sanchez v. Barr
as 19-2109
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Daniel Roberto Ramirez-Sanchez
United States of America v. Olivo (Romero)
as 18-2026
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Olivo, AKA Pito, Rafael Romero, Francis Paluzzi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edwin Romero
United States of America v. Olivo (Scott)
as 18-1817
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Olivo, AKA Pito, Edwin Romero, Rafael Romero and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wayne Scott
Ramirez Clemente v. East Side Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv02036
Plaintiff:
Domingo Roberto Ramirez Clemente
Defendant:
East Side Pizza Corp. , H&A Pizza Corp. , Amore Pizza Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez v. Fried
as 1:2016cv01722
Defendant:
Dov Fried
Plaintiff:
Roberto Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Mota et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07915
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mota and Roberto Ramirez
Defendant:
City of New York and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
