Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dwayne Robison v. Lisa Sanderson, et al
as 20-1628
Defendant / Appellee:
Elizabeth Atterberry, Regional Dir of Mental Health, Lisa Sanderson, Chief of Mental Health, Kay McIntyre, PhD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Robison
Dwayne Robison v. Karen Salemen, et al
as 20-1449
Defendant / Appellee:
Teri Lawson, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, Karen Salemen, Q.M.H.P., Individual and Official Capacity, Ashley Eastman, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Robison
Dwayne Robison v. Karen Salsmen
as 20-1291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Robison
Defendant / Appellee:
Karen Salsmen
Dwayne Robison v. Jeff Norman, et al
as 20-1106
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Sara Rogers, Mail Room Supervisor, Individual Capacity, Terry Lawson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Robison
Dwayne Robison v. Kay McIntyre, et al
as 19-3553
Defendant / Appellee:
Kay McIntyre, Regional Director of Mental Health, Karen Salesmen, Q.M.H.R. and Clinical Dir. Elizabeth Atterberry
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Robison
Dwayne Robison v. Teri Lawson, et al
as 19-3343
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeff Norman, Deputy Division Director, Teri Lawson, Warden and Anne L. Precythe, Director of Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dwayne Robison
United States v. William Robison
as 13-3807
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Robison
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States v. Christopher Robison
as 12-3063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher Shawn Robison
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
