Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Keita v. American Security Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv06375
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company, Nationwide Insurance and Plymouth Rock Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. NYPD et al
as 1:2021cv06497
Plaintiff:
Lino Joel Diaz
Defendant:
NYPD, NYS DMV, Long Island Jewish Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Samuel et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv05958
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Samuel, Legends Cafe, LLC d/b/a/ Brooklyn Rocks and Legends Cafe, LLC doing business as Brooklyn Rocks
Defendant:
Aurel Hoxha, City of New York and Alan Chao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li et. al. v. Village of Saddle Rock et. al.
as 2:2020cv02289
Plaintiff:
Jianjun Li and Chixin Fang
Defendant:
James T Murphy, Dan Levy, John Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
