Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hymon v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Roderick L. Hymon
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Christi Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hymon v. Sittre et al
as 2:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Nicole Sittre, Jennifer Schwartz, Christi Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hymon v. Doe, et al.
as 23-3797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK L. HYMON
Defendant / Appellee:
CARROL DOE, 377 Park Apartments, THEREASA MARIE WILLIAMS, VANELE DOE and others
Hymon v. Rose, et al.
as 23-3659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK L. HYMON
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer ROSE, LVMPD - Dismissed #3 and GLEN O'BRIEN, District Attorney - Dismissed #3
Hymon v. D. Jones; P#8120
as 2:2023cv01917
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
D. Jones; P#8120
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv01918
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center Medical, Steven B Wolfson, Sheriff Kevin McMahill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. Sittre, et al
as 2:2023cv01916
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Nicole Sittre, Quarstrom, Trost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. State of Nevada
as 2:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. Holthus et al
as 2:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Mary K. Holthus, Judge Schwartz, C.C.D.C. Sergent Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hymon v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Hymon
Defendant:
Carrol Doe, Thereasa Marie Williams, Vanele Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
