Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Rodney Davis
as 21-5942
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY DAVIS
USA v. Rodney Davis
as 19-3060
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodney Davis
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Boyd County, et al v. Merscorp, Inc., et al
as 14-5647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOYD COUNTY, ex rel Phillip Hedrick as County Attorney, BREATHITT COUNTY, ex rel Brendon Miller as County Attorney, CARTER COUNTY, ex rel Patrick Flannery as County Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Rodney Davis v. Terri Gonzalez
as 12-56473
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRI GONZALEZ, Warden
William Armstrong v. Timothy F. Geithner, et al
as 09-5172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William H. Armstrong
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, Rodney Davis and Other Unnamed Persons
Griffith v. Smith et al
as 3:2009mc00035
Plaintiff:
James W. Griffith
Defendant:
Tanya Smith, Flora Jean Holland, Kodihall Channabasappa and others
USA v. Rodney Davis
as 08-6173
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY DAVIS
ARMSTRONG v. PAULSON et al
as 1:2007cv01963
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
HENRY M. PAULSON, JR., RODNEY DAVIS and OTHER UNNAMED PERSONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.