Cases 11 - 19 of 19
WELLS v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2011mc00061
Plaintiff:
RODNEY WELLS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
WELLS v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2011cv01929
Plaintiff:
RODNEY WELLS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Rodney Well
as 11-1493
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: RODNEY WELLS
Defendant - Respondent:
DA PHILADELPHIA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
GENE E K PRATTER
WELLS v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2010cv07114
Plaintiff:
RODNEY WELLS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Wells v. Roger King
as 09-1842
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY WELLS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROGER KING, Assistant District Attorney Of The County of Philadelphia, etal
WELLS v. KING
as 2:2008mc00124
Petitioner:
RODNEY WELLS
Respondent:
ROGER E. KING
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WELLS v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILA. COUNTY et al
as 2:2007cv00743
Plaintiff:
RODNEY WELLS
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILA. COUNTY and RODNEY E. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. WYNDER
as 2:2007cv00239
Petitioner:
RODNEY WELLS
Respondent:
JAMES T. WYNDER, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WELLS v. VARNER et al
as 2:2003cv00727
Petitioner:
RODNEY WELLS
Respondent:
BEN VARNER , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
