Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. K-Mart Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Greta G. Davis
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:1988cv03885
Plaintiff:
Delores Holmes
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kreis v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kreis
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co., KCD IP LLC dba Craftsman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson v. Marc Ecko UN LTD et al
as 3:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gregory Walker Johnson
Defendant:
Marc Ecko UN LTD, Perry Ellis International, Sears Roebuck Co and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Levi Strauss et al
as 3:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
Gregory Walker Johnson
Defendant:
Levi Strauss, VF Corporation Wrangler and Nautica, Phillips Van Heusen Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crawford v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 3:2008cv02905
Plaintiff:
Amy Crawford, Amy Crawford and Amy Crawford
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Torres v. Sears Roebuck and Company
as 2:2008mc00056
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Torres
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Company
Immerman et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 1:2008cv02112
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Immerman, Mark Spicknall and Robert P. Sweeney
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
