Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Paulk v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv14313
Plaintiff:
Reginald Andrew Paulk
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, David Randall, Thomas Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Roebuck v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv17085
Plaintiff:
Alicia Roebuck
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. Roebuck III et al
as 9:2017cv80213
Plaintiff:
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
Defendant:
Arthur R. Roebuck, III, Patricia R. Swindle, Scribe Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merit Diamond Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 1:2016cv25112
Plaintiff:
Merit Diamond Corporation
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Sears Holdings Management Corporation, Sears Brands, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv61137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv80836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Marin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2016cv20574
Plaintiff:
Jazmin Marin
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hernandez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2016cv20150
Plaintiff:
Daysi Hernandez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Mediator:
Markel Arrizabalaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
