Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Domni v. County of Nassau
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
LEK DOMNI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, Police Officer CHRISTOPHER LAMONICA, Police Officer FREDERICK TRIFARO and others
Eubanks v. Hansell
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
JAMAL EUBANKS, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jace Eubanks, deceased and J. E., an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Jamal Eubanks
Defendant:
DAVID HANSELL, former Commissioner, NEW YORK CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, JOHN AND JANE ROES, said names being fictitious and intended to represent individual attorneys, caseworkers, investigators, youth development specialists, members, agents, servants and/or employees of the New York City Administration for Children's S and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-241
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-180
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN CHADWICK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, MARKUS FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CATHERINE MCKOY, Individually
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Intervenor:
RAJ K. PATEL
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-181
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
EBIN New York, Inc. v. SIC Enterprise, Inc.
as 23-7444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SIC ENTERPRISE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, (said names being fictitious), JOHN ROE CORPS. 110, (said names being fictitious), TOM TRADING, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brightman v. InMode Ltd.
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. Lori A. Brightman, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
InMode Ltd., a foreign limited liability corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Inclusive and Roe Corporations 11-20, Inclusive
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collector's Coffee Inc.
as 23-871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Collector's Coffee Inc., DBA Collectors Cafe
Intervenor:
Los Angeles Dodgers LLC, Doe Individuals 1 through 50, Roe Corporations 1 through 50 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mykalai Kontilai
Hulinsky v. County of Westchester County Department of Public
as 23-804
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Sally Roe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
40 Days for Life, a nonprofit corporation of the State of Texas, White Plains 40 Days for Life, as unincorporated association of the State of New York, Oksana Hulinsky and others
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Westchester
Defendant:
County of Westchester County Department of Public Safety, Terrance Raynor, Acting Commissioner of the Westchester Department of Public Safety, in his official capacity, New Rochelle Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
