Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Williams v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2012cv05765
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, The Attorney General Of Illinois, Illinois State University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kozicky v. Granite City Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Charles Kozicky
Defendant:
Granite City Police Department, Robert Jones, Craig Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckles v. Thompson et al
as 1:2012cv01194
Plaintiff:
Arick Buckles
Defendant:
John E. Thompson , William J. Redshaw , L. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Schield, et al
as 1:2012cv03305
Plaintiff:
Andre Smith
Defendant:
William Schield, John Doe, Jack Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jovanta Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , John Doe, Jack Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chester
Defendant:
Officer Williams, Officer Coleman, James Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2011cv01382
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Attorney General of Illinois, Illinois State University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Clavijo et al
as 1:2011cv03957
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Roe
Defendant:
Paul Clavijo, Juan Vasquez and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene-McCann v. Ogle County et al
as 3:2011cv50125
Plaintiff:
Valorie R Greene-McCann
Defendant:
Ogle County , Michael R. Harn , Gregory A. Beitel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Craig Lawrence and Alberto Hinojosa
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Garcia, Ruben Martinez Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
