Copyrights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Luis Pizarro et al v. Francisco Aguilar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02252
Cross Claimant: Francisco Aguilar, Arietis Inc, Intrigue and others
Defendant: Francisco Aguilar, Alfred Haber Inc, Arietis Inc and others
Cross Defendant: Sonia Pizarro Lopez, Luis Pizarro, Lyndah Pizarro and others
Plaintiff: Sonia Pizarro Lopez, Luis Pizarro and Lyndah Pizarro
Barry Rosen v. The ServInt Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01940
Defendant: Does and The ServInt Corporation
Counter Defendant: Roes 1-10 and Barry Rosen
Plaintiff: Barry Rosen
Counter Claimant: The ServInt Corporation
Buckley H. Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09509
Plaintiff: Buckley H. Crispin
Petitioner: JR 93 Inc
Defendant: Christian Audigier, Inc., Nervous Tattoo, Inc., Shop On Stage, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: New Life Company, LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Hon. Patricia L Collins
Cross Defendant: Audigier Brand Management Group, LLC and ROES
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ming Lin v. Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03904
Plaintiff: Ming Lin
Defendant: Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd., Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd., New Bridge Media, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: ROES and Ming Lin
Counter Claimant: New Bridge Media, Inc., New Bridge Media, Inc., Jin Xiu He and others
ThirdParty Defendant: Esther Li, Guo Hua Ning, Roes 6-10 and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: New Bridge Media, Inc., New Bridge Media, Inc., Jin Xiu He and others
Cross Defendant: MOES, New Bridge Media, Inc. and Jin Xiu He
Cross Claimant: Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd. and Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Belk, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03286
Plaintiff: LA Printex Industries, Inc. and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Belk, Inc., Belk, Inc., Around the World Apparel, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: ROES and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Around the World Apparel, Inc., Around the World Apparel, Inc. and Around the World Apparel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dreamroom Productions, Inc. v. John Doe # 1 et al
as 2:2009cv02583
Plaintiff: Dreamroom Productions, Inc. and Dreamroom Productions, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe # 1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Beyond Electronics Inc. v. Emax Wireless, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01926
Plaintiff: Beyond Electronics Inc.
Defendant: Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Roes and Beyond Electronics Inc.
Counter Claimant: Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc., Emax Wireless, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
ATI Industries, Inc v. Art and Frame Mart Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01296
Plaintiff: ATI Industries, Inc
Defendant: Art and Frame Mart Corporation, DOES and ROES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RDI of Michigan, LLC v. Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv11177
Plaintiff: RDI of Michigan, LLC and RDI of Michigan, LLC
Defendant: Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Incorporated, Jordan Mirch, Jordan Mirch and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Chiqui Chef Corporation v. Culinary Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01317
Plaintiff: Chiqui Chef Corporation and Chiqui Chef Corporation
Defendant: Culinary Entertainment, Inc., Bernice Guzman-de-Padial, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?