Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Roe v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00024
Petitioner:
Nicholas Lee Roe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart v. South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility et al
as 4:2013cv03418
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Stewart
Respondent:
South Texas Intermediate Sanction Facility, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Chandler, Warden
as 4:2013cv00721
Petitioner:
Nicholas Lee Roe
Respondent:
Rodney A Chandler, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Porter v. Scott et al
as 6:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Frazier Porter
Defendant:
FNU Scott, FNU Clayton, FNU Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Roe et al
as 6:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Roe, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Senior Warden Scott et al
as 6:2012cv00258
Plaintiff:
Castullo Hernandez
Defendant:
Senior Warden Scott, Mr Clayton Sr, Mrs Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeGefferd v. Forni et al
as 6:2011cv00711
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E DeGefferd
Defendant:
Patricia Forni, Robert D Roe, Joseph M Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Roe, et al
as 6:2010cv00243
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Betty Williams M.D. , Brenda Hough N.P. , Charles Nagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilliard v. Mrs Jones et al
as 4:2009cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Hilliard
Defendant:
Mrs Jones, John Peter Smith Hospital, Wallace Sprayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baugh v. City of Jacksonville, Texas et al
as 6:2008cv00219
Plaintiff:
David George Baugh
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Texas, Officer With Assault Rifle, Officer With Drawn Revolver and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
