Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Steele v. First National Bank of Mifflintown et al
as 1:2011cv01124
Plaintiff:
John T. Steele
Defendant:
First National Bank of Mifflintown and Elyse Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOMINION RETAIL, INC. v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
DOMINION RETAIL, INC.
Defendant:
TIM ROGERS, TIM TERRELL, GARY SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. WALID HASSOUN NAAMAN et al
as 2:2010cv07410
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
WALID HASSOUN NAAMAN, ROGER D. NAAMAN and EDGAR THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
ESSLINGER et al v. HSBC BANK USA INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03213
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. ESSLINGER , GLORIA GLOVER and ARDATH ROGERS
Defendant:
HSBC BANK USA INC. and HSBC CARD SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mills v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv01211
Plaintiff:
Roger L Mills
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Soler v Fernandez
as 3:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Roger Soler
Defendant:
Ramon Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. C&G CONTRACTING CO., INC. et al
as 5:2009cv02546
Plaintiff:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
C&G CONTRACTING CO., INC., GBU CONTRACTORS, INC., ROGER NARANJO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
BOGER v. BOGER
as 5:2009cv01932
Plaintiff:
ROGER A. BOGER
Defendant:
JUDITH J. BOGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HALL v. TOLL et al
as 2:2009cv01405
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HALL
Defendant:
ROBERT I. TOLL, BRUCE E. TOLL, ZVI BARZILAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
MARTINEZ v. TOLL et al
as 2:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
OLIVERIO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ROBERT I. TOLL, BRUCE E. TOLL, ZVI BARZILAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
