Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Case name not on file
as 3:2016mc00079
Movant:
Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC
Gharzeddine v. Dunaway et al
as 3:2015cv00609
Plaintiff:
Farid Said Gharzeddine
Defendant:
Albert Bryan Dunaway, Carrington Mortgage Services, Selene Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lacey et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Lacey and Melissa A. Lacey
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., EMC Mortgage, LLC , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC V. HARDEE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00240
Defendant:
BEATRICE D. HARDEE and MELTON J. HARDEE
Plaintiff:
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sutton v. McCrory et al
as 5:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kelly Sutton
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, John W. Smith, Phil Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Brock and Scott, PLLC et al
as 3:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Toye W. Allen and Arnold Tyler
Defendant:
Brock and Scott, PLLC, Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NOLAN v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
DONNA K. NOLAN
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and ROGERS, TOWNSEND & THOMAS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC v. Boehm
as 1:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC
Defendant:
Candice Boehm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARTER et al v. ROGERS, TOWNSEND, & THOMAS, P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
JAMES J CARTER and GLADYS M CARTER
Defendant:
ROGERS, TOWNSEND, & THOMAS, P.C., DAVID N., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
