Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Burton v. Rohan et al
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Daymeyan Burton
Defendant:
C/O Rohan, William Hutchings, J. Scally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2020cv00780
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Justin Marzec, Derek Jappe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl H Bond, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidal et al v. Internal Affairs LVMPD et al
as 2:2019cv02130
Defendant:
Lueck, Poupard, Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Schoras, James Neske, Francisco Vidal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidal et al v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2019cv01578
Defendant:
Rowe, Poupard, Sheriff Joe Lombardo and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Scharas, Khloe Ann Vidal, James Neske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Bean et al
as 2:2019cv01021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
C/O Rohan and AW Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Craig-Rohan et al
as 2:2018cv02207
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Phillip J. Kohn, Jasmine D Spells and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtze v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2018cv00539
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Kurtze
Defendant:
Joseph Lombardo, Luek, Luong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sitton v. LVMPD et al
as 2:2017cv00111
Defendant:
CCS Baker, Bean, Billingsley and others
Plaintiff:
Will Sitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. Mascarenhas et al
as 2:2013cv01603
Defendant:
Xiaohong Doughty, Rohan Earl Mascarenhas and Safeco Insurance Company Of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Brenda Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01527
Defendant:
Behrens, Binko, Richard Bissett and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
