Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pavon v. ClarkDietrich Engineering Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rojas Pavon
Defendant:
ClarkDietrich Engineering Services, LLC and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Rojas v. DebtEaze LLC
as 4:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
DebtEaze LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rojas et al v. Huber
as 3:2022cv05042
Plaintiff:
Chanda Rojas, A.R.B., a minor, and A.R., a minor
Defendant:
Jace L. Huber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rojas v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Mable P. Rojas
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Escobar et al v. Rennert et al
as 4:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bertha Acuna Escobar , Jacqueline Magali Acuna Ibaceta , Rosa Marilyn Aguirre Medina and others
Defendant:
The Doe Run Resources Corporation , Marvin K. Kaiser , Albert Bruce Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. El Volcan, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
El Volcan, LLC, Romona E. Galindo, Alberto Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Rojas v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Mable P. Rojas
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Cox et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2014cv01417
Plaintiff:
Beverly Cox , Cleon Clark , Julie Hennessy and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Karnes et al v. C.R. Bard, INC.
as 4:2013cv01681
Plaintiff:
Barbara Karnes , Kerry Karnes , Kathleen Harding and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojas v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mable P. Rojas
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
