Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brik v. Brodie et al
as 1:2023cv04330
Plaintiff:
Roman Brik
Defendant:
Judge Margo K. Brodie and Judge Ann M. Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brik v. McFarland et al
as 1:2023cv03507
Plaintiff:
Roman Brik
Defendant:
Janet McFarland and Court Officer Lavanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rochester, NY NAACP Branch #2172 et al v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2022cv06558
Plaintiff:
Rochester, NY NAACP Branch #2172, Faith Leaders Roundtable, Robin Wilt and others
Defendant:
Monroe County, Adam Bello, Steven Brew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldstein et al v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2022cv06536
Plaintiff:
Linda Garner Goldstein, Michael D. Ditullio, Craig R. Lending and others
Defendant:
Monroe County, Adam Bello, Sabrina Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06737
Plaintiff:
Carlton Roman
Defendant:
The City of New York, Catherine Lomuscio, William Pepey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06681
Plaintiff:
Carlton Roman
Defendant:
The City of New York, Catherine Lomuscio, Detective William Pepey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
