Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Arreola-Romero v. United States
as 1:2023cv00685
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola-Romero
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wells et al v. Philbin et al
as 1:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
Joshua Westover, Michael Brandon Hill, Jeremy John Wells and others
Defendant:
Warden Edward Philbin, FNU Fluker, FNU Everet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUZMAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 5:2019cv00252
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, AGENT JONES, AGENT REED and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROMERO GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv02669
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Agent M. Jones and Agent J. Reed
Plaintiff:
Roberto Romero Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mendoza-Perez et al v. Dhillon
as 1:2019cv00722
Plaintiff:
Santana Cardenas, Victor Manuel Sanchez, Eduardo Lopez-Romero and others
Defendant:
Uttam Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arreola-Romero v. United States
as 1:2019cv00748
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola-Romero
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffin v. Harmon et al
as 1:2018cv03073
Plaintiff:
Marvin Griffin
Defendant:
D. J. Harmon, J. A. Keller, AW Mackenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin et al v. Harmon et al
as 1:2018cv02066
Plaintiff:
Marvin Griffin
Defendant:
D. J. Harmon, J. A. Keller, AW Mackenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romero-Carrascal v. Federal Bureau of Prisions
as 5:2017cv00156
Petitioner:
Gustavo Romero-Carrascal
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Molina v. USA
as 1:2017cv01823
Petitioner:
Eneyda Romero Molina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
