Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Romero v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Laura Romero
Defendant:
City of New York and NYPD Police Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez Romero v. Arteta et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Francisco A Martinez Romero
Respondent:
Paul Arteta, Kenneth Genalo, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Gonzalez v. Gilpin et al
as 9:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Arce Gonzalez
Defendant:
CDO Gilpin, Major Sires, Romero Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
The State of New York, Jeff McKoy, Brabant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Bussanich et al
as 1:2022cv10909
Plaintiff:
Ludwig Crisis Zelaya Romero
Defendant:
A.J. Bussanich, Robert Beaudouln, Gerson Bitem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
Ludwig Criss Zelaya Romero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romero v. Rich
as 1:2022cv00686
Petitioner:
Anthony Romero
Respondent:
Supt. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv03125
Defendant:
City of New York and Corrections Officer John Doe
Plaintiff:
Anthony Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
The State of New York, Anthony J. Annucci, T Rufa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Rich
as 6:2020cv06281
Respondent:
Supt. Rich
Petitioner:
Anthony Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
