Cases 1 - 10 of 21
GEDEON v. PRATTER et al
as 2:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
GENE E.K. PRATTER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JACQUELINE ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GREEN
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, JACQUELINE C. ROMERO, JUDGE MOSS BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. P/O SEDLER #7592 et al
as 2:2023cv02632
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GREEN
Respondent:
P/O SEDLER #7592, JUDGE MOSS, LARRY KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GEDEON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2023cv01600
Plaintiff:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DISTRICT ATTORNEY, VERIZON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parada v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Romero Parada
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Romero v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Carlos Romero
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROMERO v. WELLPATH
as 2:2019cv01677
Defendant:
WELLPATH
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales Romero v. York County Prison Administration
as 3:2019cv00153
Defendant:
York County Prison Administration
Plaintiff:
Axel Javier Morales Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2018cv00502
Petitioner:
Emilio Romero
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROMERO v. MEEKS
as 1:2014cv00011
Petitioner:
JOSE ROMERO
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
