Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lewis et al v. Cuomo et al
as 6:2020cv06316
Plaintiff:
Shannon Joy, Duane Whitmer, Seth Duclos and others
Defendant:
Todd K. Baxter, Empire State Development Corporation, Jamie Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv00583
Plaintiff:
Shannon Joy, Duane Whitmer, Seth Duclos and others
Defendant:
Empire State Development Corporation, Jamie Romero, Douglas A. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Rich
as 6:2020cv06281
Respondent:
Supt. Rich
Petitioner:
Anthony Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cordero Romero v. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00834
Plaintiff:
Veronica Cordero Romero
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Jones, et al v. Crisis Services of Erie County, et al
as 1:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Rochelle M. Jones and James L. Thomas
Defendant:
Crisis Services of Erie County, Sherry, Mandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Koenigsmann et al
as 1:2015cv00497
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, M.D., Benjamin A. Oakes and Wesley K. Canfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Comr - State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
Comr - State of New York, S. Wenderlich and Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2015cv06155
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, Jan Szablick, Jeffrey Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Ellis, et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
William Ellis and C.O.s on A-block 2 floor 7 to 3 shift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
