Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Hernandez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00270
Petitioner:
Carlos Romero Hernandez
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. USA
as 1:2022cv00459
Petitioner:
Jaime Cruz Romero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Belcher v. Great Lakes Insurance SE
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Glenda Belcher
Defendant:
Great Lakes Insurance SE and Jimmy Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Snellings v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
United States of America, Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Securityi Threat Group Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snellings v. Espinoza et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
C Espinoza, Joseph R Biden, Jr, J Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Apostolic Church of Beaumont Texas, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
The Apostolic Church of Beaumont Texas, Inc.
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company and Jimmy Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis et al v. Klawonn et al
as 4:2021cv00977
Plaintiff:
Romero Ellis and Joshlen Clay
Defendant:
Mark G Klawonn and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00802
Petitioner:
Edwin Riascos Romero
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00750
Petitioner:
Edwin Riascos Romero
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosete, et al v. Time Transportation & Leasing, Inc., et al
as 1:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
Saida Romero, Nancy Lim, Gerardo Rosete and others
Defendant:
Shannon Wheat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
