Cases 11 - 20 of 22
McDonald et al v. Dark Horse Steel et al
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald , George Bosiljevac , Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Dark Horse Steel, Ascent Construction, Gear30 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Romero et al v. State of Utah, The et al
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Thomas Romero and Julie Tapia
Defendant:
State of Utah, The , Utah Highway Patrol and Lisa Steed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Romero v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Prestine J. Romero
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Lowry et al v. Romero et al
as 2:2011cv01075
Plaintiff:
Emily Lowry and Kenna Ellis
Defendant:
Michelle Romero , Annette B. Cavaness , Christian J. Seegmiller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cox v. Salt Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
Terry Cox
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Jail, FNU Church, FNU Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Dark Horse Steel et al
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Mike Baker, Michael McDonald, Jerry Romero and others
Defendant:
Dark Horse Steel, Scot Evans and Jessie Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Powell v. Huntsman et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Maxwell C. Powell
Defendant:
Jon Huntsman, Jr., Tom Patterson, Warden Turley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. Bayer et al
as 2:2008cv00460
Plaintiff:
Edilea Romero
Defendant:
Bayer, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McDonald et al v. BEKO Associates et al
as 2:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, George Bosiljevac, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
BEKO Associates and Beatrix Koev
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Romero v. McGerry et al
as 2:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Romero
Defendant:
Paul McGerry, Linda Peterson, Fred Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
