Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CAMMARATA v. DONNELLY et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMMARATA
Defendant:
JOHN V. DONNELLY, III, CHAD F. KENNEY, DAVID J. IGNALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv21625
Petitioner:
WILMER CHAVEZ ROMERO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romero v. WARDEN OF FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2022cv06720
Petitioner:
Abel Romero
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN OF FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROMERO v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv07922
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROMERO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMERO v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05070
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ROMERO
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROMERO v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2014cv06344
Petitioner:
MAURICE ROMERO
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROMERO v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2013cv07695
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. ROMERO
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN and ROBIN GEHRMANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. ADKINS et al
as 1:2012cv05132
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMIL INGRAM
Defendant:
ALBERT RITCHER, CHRIS FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv00003
Movant:
RAFAEL ROMERO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2010cv00422
Petitioner:
ELVIS ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN TSOUKARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
