Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Barstad v. Department of Corrections State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
James Barstad
Defendant:
Department of Corrections State of Washington, Bernard E Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Van Boening et al
as 2:2011cv01942
Plaintiff:
Sky-Steven Thomas Miller
Defendant:
Ron Van Boening, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Sandberg v. Richard Groff, et al
as 11-35694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON WILLIAM SANDBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD GROFF, Counselor, DANIEL FITZPATRICK, KARIN ARNOLD and others
Charles Reed v. State of Washington, et al
as 11-35690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES V REED
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, KELLY J REMY, MICHAEL HUGHES and others
Hien Tu v. Ron Boening
as 11-35646
Petitioner - Appellant:
HIEN V TU
Respondent - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent
Calvin Rouse v. Ron Van Boening, et al
as 11-35200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN ROUSE, AKA Abdur Rashid Khalif
Defendant - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, DENNIS TABB, JOHN BARNES and others
Brooks v. Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board et al
as 3:2011cv05152
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board, Rob McKenna, Ron Van Boening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Holmberg v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 11-35146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. HOLMBERG
Defendant:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, RON VAN BOENING, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Joshua Frost v. Ron Van Boening
as 11-35114
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA JAMES FROST
Respondent - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent
Jason Sandberg v. Ron Van Boening, et al
as 11-35086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON WILLIAM SANDBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent, RICHARD GROFF, Counselor, DANIEL FITZPATRICK, CPM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
