Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ronald Moore v. Grady Memorial Hospital Corp., et al
as 19-14335
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH J. CARNEY, M.D., FULTON-DEKALB HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d.b.a. Grady Health System, KELVIN J. HOLLOWAY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD E. MOORE
Moore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2019cv01274
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Moore and Ronald E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Ronnie Dixon
as 17-10952
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONNIE DIXON, a.k.a. Ronnie Dickson, a.k.a. Ronald Wilks, a.k.a. Ronald C. Dixon, a.k.a. Ronald E. Moore, Jr.
Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust et al v. R&C Construction Services Company, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Benefit Trust , Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust and Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Annuity Trust
Defendant:
R&C Construction Services Company, LLC, Cheryl L. Moore and Ronald E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-14719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hoffman et al v. R.E. Moore Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01550
Plaintiff:
Tom Hoffman, Tom Hoffman, Tom Hoffman and others
Defendant:
R.E. Moore Construction, Inc. and Ronald E. Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
