Cases 21 - 30 of 95
Samuel Valdez v. Ronald Haynes
as 22-35596
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL VALDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent
Curry v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05493
Petitioner:
Vernon Lewis Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Ramos v. Washington State Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-35489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON MICHEAL RAMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections, STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
White v. Brady et al
as 3:2022cv05447
Plaintiff:
Joel White
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, Tracy L Brady, Charles Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Hayes
as 3:2022cv05367
Petitioner:
Daryl Rogers and Daryl Craig Rogers
Respondent:
Ronald Hayes and Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivie v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05197
Petitioner:
Martin Stanley Ivie
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Ferguson
as 3:2022cv05118
Petitioner:
Daniel Ryan Griffin
Respondent:
Robert Ferguson and Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benjamin Asaeli v. Ronald Haynes
as 22-35128
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN SALOFI ASAELI
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Vincent Melendrez v. Ronald Haynes
as 22-35110
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINCENT PAUL MELENDREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYNES
Mozqueda v. Haynes
as 2:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Edward Alberto Mozqueda
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
