Cases 41 - 50 of 494
Turner v. King et al
as 1:2020cv00105
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Sup. Ronald King
Petitioner:
Johnny Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eacholes v. Taylor et al
as 3:2020cv00243
Defendant:
Ronald King, Tommy Taylor and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Deairis Simone Eacholes
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Sheriff Kelvin Williams and Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00235
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen McCoy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Love v. Dyer et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Gains S. Dyer, Lynn Fitch and Ronald King
Plaintiff:
William Wade Love
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. King
as 3:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Joseph Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Love v. Reeves et al
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Ronald King and Lyth Fitch
Plaintiff:
William Wade Love
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Reeves et al
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Ronald King and Lynn Fitch
Plaintiff:
William Wade Love
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Coleman et al
as 3:2020cv00177
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant:
Chief Justice Judge Linda F. Coleman, MS Attorney General Lynn Fitch, Superintendent Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eacholes v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Tammy Taylor, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Deairis Simone Eacholes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
