Cases 11 - 20 of 48
EMRIT v. PRATT et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Defendant:
CHIEF DISIPLINARY COUNSEL, ATTORNEY KARA PRATT, TEXAS SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
EMRIT v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW, PRESIDENT and DEAN OF LAW SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 0:2023cv60014
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
EMRIT v. JULES
as 4:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SABINE AISHA JULES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EMRIT v. FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE DEPARMENT and CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Fort Lauderdale Police Department et al
as 0:2022cv62038
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Fort Lauderdale Police Department and Clark County, Nevada Custodian of Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
EMRIT v. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE
as 1:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
