Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Oliver v. Batchelor
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnie Oliver, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Ronnie K. Batchelor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perdomo v. Department of Human Service, Division of Child Support Services et al
as 1:2022cv04484
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Perdomo
Defendant:
Department of Human Service, Division of Child Support Services, Department of Human Service, Gwinnett County Child Support Service, Kelly Norman and others
Bradley v. Batchelor et al
as 4:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Bradley
Defendant:
Ronnie K. Batchelor, Daniel Porter, Christopher Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard Lee v. Daniel Porter, et al
as 16-10591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD ANDERSON LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL J. PORTER, JENNIFER HENDEE, RONNIE K. BATCHELOR and others
Vaughn v. Conway et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Alan Vaughn
Defendant:
Butch Conway, Richard Alexander, Danny Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Porter et al
as 1:2015cv04507
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Jennifer Hendee, Ronnie K. Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Batchelor et al
as 1:2015cv04422
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Mosby
Defendant:
Ronnie K. Batchelor, Marlene Zekser, Richard T. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03346
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Ronnie K. Batchelor, Daniel J. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Shavers
as 14-14752
Petitioner:
SHAWN ANTONIO SHAVERS
Mandamus Respondent:
R.L. (BUTCH) CONWAY, ADRIAN SMITH WATKINS, Gwinnett County Jail, et. seq., GEORGE F. HUTCHINSON, III, Sheriff and others
WILSON v. FLYNN et al
as 1:2013cv01268
Plaintiff:
ALLEN DEWAYNE WILSON
Defendant:
C J FLYNN, Ronnie K. Batchelor, MATTHEW CROSBY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
